Wednesday, February 13, 2013


Supply Side Economics
 
The Laffer curve is very simple really, and despite what the idiots on the TV networks say, is very real. It affects our own decision making in a very real way. The theorum is simply put "the is a point ot tax rate beyond which revenue falls off as taxpayers become discouraged and withdraw from whatever activity they were persuing to create their income. The press may not believe it, but no less a personage than the President of the United States, Barack Obama, does. He stated as much in his first campaign in 2008.
This burden is a sum of all their burdens, not just the Federal Income tax. The burden includes (but is not limited to) all Federal, State, and local taxes and fees; the cost of tax compliance and reporting; and the burden of regulators, inspections, and compliance with an ever-changing morass of enigmatic rules. We the people are buckling one-by-one under this burden. Some of using are retiring on pension, some of us retiring early to take pension later, people take partial Social Security at 62 instead of the full amount at 66, many are going on marginally deserved disability, many have moved into the underground economy, many are persuing a life of crime, our children live at home and do not persue employment, and many people are just walking away from employment altogether.

Those in charge either don't recognize what they see or see this as a desirable end.

 
 
When I hear tha North Korea has both an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile and a fission nuclear weapon, I think of the back cover of the November 1968 issue of Mad Magazine (above).
Kim Jong-Un only needs one well placed missile to set off all the rest of the bombs in the world.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

There is a series of You Tube videos I would like to recommend,
The Siver Bullet and the Silver Shield.
There are 48 in all, and I think you will want to watch every one. The author, Truth Never Told, is insightful and will leave you wanting more. Enjoy.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Regarding the Facecrack IPO.
 
It makes me sick to have to defend them, But: EVERY IPO starts like this. There is a pent up demand that is released suddenly amid much hype.. Even long term survivors are upside-down at this point. But the point of most IPOs is to raise capital for a physical infrastructure. The purpose of this one was to harvest the founder's rewards. Not a good reason for an IPO. If people would buy stocks with a track record of dividends rather than try to surf the bleeding edge. If they would only treat stocks as an on-going profit machine rather than a dice roll, we would all be better off.
Eduardo Severin is off to Galt's Gulch

From time-to-time. people tell me that Atlas Shrugged is "ridiculous" that people would not act that way. Of course that presumption that people would not act in their rational self interest is the scoffing belief of the looters in the book also. But observe Eduardo Saverin. He engineered the idea of his friend and partner Mark Zuckerberg that is Facebook. whether you like Facebook or not, it is an economic engine that helps power the world and its economy.

It can happen here.
From a reader comment section of an article on the release of the book"the Amateur".

He is positively correct, and the reason I actually
refer to myself as a Liberal, when everyone else calls me
"conservative". I am not what everyone calls Liberal today. That is
NOT Liberal, that is statist and "Progressive". Progressing to the
same old "man was born to be a slave" mentality of the last several
thousand years. Nicely said.

******************************************************
SPARKS FROM WYATT’S TORCH

Conservatives and libertarians should stop calling Democrats
"liberals" ---- because they are helping the Democrats with this label
--- not hurting them.

While many Democrats and other leftists agitate in favor of socialism
or communism [distinctions without a difference], the majority of them
prefer the Nazi / fascist economic model --- which works out in
practical terms to the "crony capitalist progressivism" now practiced
by Barak Hushpuppy OhBummer, the OhBummer Wrecking Crew, the Democrat
party at-large, and the “establishment” / "RINO"
[Republican-In-Name-Only] Republicans.

{Chris's note: Here is my only objection to the piece. I do not believe name-calling is a  tool of reasonable people}

Keep in mind here that Hitler and Mussolini launched their political
careers as Marxist communists and later they adopted political
disguise for their agenda of moral cannibalism and “eating the rich.”

Does this sound familiar, given who now controls the White House and
the US Senate?

Note that progressivism, socialism, Nazism [“national socialism”],
fascism and communism are all joined-at-the-hip in their common
contempt, enmity, and disdain for human rights. More on this, later.

Now, the Democrat [and other leftist] technique for character
assassination is what it has always been --- a barrage of outright
lies, half-truths, misrepresentations, innuendos, misinformation,
disinformation, and poisonous propaganda --- all of that directed at
anyone who obstructs their access to our wallets and our other
property --- and especially any public figure who rises to fight them
with any prospect of beating them and liberating the American people
from the Democrats' kleptocracy.

In the past thirty years or so, from Ronald Reagan going forward, the
technique has been to try and destroy anyone before they rose within
striking distance of the Supreme Court, the Congress, or the White
House.

These Democrat propagandists could and can count on the corrupt,
complicit, and compliant sycophants in the Democrat-captured media to
help keep their propaganda afloat and their dictatorship fastened on
the backs of the American people.

Listen up, if you are a privately-employed, non-government taxpayer---
and thus a member of America’s # 1 class of victims.

We are ruled by armed force and by fraud by lying, thieving, arrogant,
bloodsucking, greedy-for-the-unearned, tax-eating government hoodlums,
gangsters, and thugs, by spies, spooks, and snoops, and by their
sticky-fingered constituents and assorted limpets, lampreys,
barnacles, parasites, and other hangers-on.

And they are our “protectors!” Just ask them and this predatory
humanitarian Mafia will tell you so.

Who protects us from our protectors? The outspoken American citizen
under the First Amendment --- and the armed citizen under the Second
Amendment to the US Constitution.

Little wonder, then, that the Democrats seek to destroy the First
Amendment --- in order to silence their critics by prohibiting “hate
speech” --- and that they seek to misinterpret and destroy the Second
Amendment in order to disarm their intended victims --- those whom
they intend to silence and to plunder. Freedom of speech works best
when millions of guns in private hands are aimed at our rulers.

---------------------------------------------------------

Now, are you ready for this?

What this country needs is a truly LIBERAL president and congress and
judiciary! And I forgive the reader for suspecting that this must be
some kind of bad joke!

But the Democrats believe in "statism" --- not "liberalism."

Strip them naked of their “liberal” camouflage and behold their ugliness.

They benefit from the imprecise American political terminology ---- we
say "the government" here in the USA ---- rather than "the state." And
that's a dangerous problem.

Famous brands of statism in recent centuries have been Nazism,
socialism, fascism, communism, progressivism, and welfare statism ----
these last two are mixtures of fascism and socialism.

Liberalism, on the other hand, is a political philosophy of small,
cheap government ---- it is a constabulary ---- and the job of a
liberal government is to enforce human rights within its own
jurisdiction.

What "human rights?"

I speak of the unalienable and perfectly-natural and universally-valid
human rights of life, liberty, private property, and the pursuit of
personal happiness.

A slave is owned by someone other than himself --- but a free man owns himself.

The first article of private property is "the self" --- and all other
rights are derivatives of and flow from these cardinal rights.

These rights ---- The Rights of Man ---- are the gift of nature or of
nature's god ---- and they belong to all human beings, everywhere.

Show me a Democrat who subscribes to all of the above, without
qualifications or weasel words.

The words "liberal" and "liberalism" were hijacked by the Democrats,
socialists, progressives, and fascists, long ago ---- and it was the
mistake of conservatives and libertarians to let them get away with
it.

It is long past time that liberalism be reclaimed, defined, and
explained by its rightful owners ---- by the champions of freedom,
i.e.: not by Democrats.

Friends of freedom! Friends of peace-through-strength! And friends of
prosperity!

Declare yourselves to be "liberals," then ---- and kick over the
bloody coffee tables --- and overthrow and trounce the Democrats in
2012! Destroy them!

Sunday, May 6, 2012

It has been a while since I wrote anything. Perhaps you can blame on Facebook, perhaps you can blame on my spending more time with my dogs. But in any event, I have neglected my wirting and I humbly apologize. I will try to do better. And I will do my best not to be so arrogant as my old college classmates who are so certain that they are the only ones who can be right, while the whole time they defend their positions with pomposity and ad hominum attacks of the viscious kind. I will never change them, I shouldn't try. I truly believe I can maintain my agnostic position of searching for truth without tearing down those whose beliefs are based on Credo, whether they are Christians or Atheists. I leave out Jews  as they are generally more tolerant of others as are the Buddhists and Hindi. And I leave out the Muslims until they can demonstrate the ability to play well with others In the meantime "I will call them as I see them", not worrying so much if I say things that others don't believe as long as I say things I believe.
And to my Facebook and Shimer friends I actually don't watch Fox News but maybe I should. Apparently they see things more openly and evenly than you do.

Credo.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Well said:

Mike McKee on Occupy Wall Street's "problems"
The political left owns these morons. They're merely a more visible manifestation of what most liberals think. This circus ought to invalidate liberalism for good (or at least until the next generation comes along that unfortunately has to learn this lesson all over again).

Contrast the crime, disease, and overall idiocy of OWS with the Tea Party demonstrations and anyone with a functioning brain cell can immediately see the stark difference. When 1.5 million Tea Partiers descended on D.C. in 2009 not only was there no crime or arrests (a ridiculous notion if you were actually there to witness it, and I was) but they didn't even leave so much as a discarded gum wrapper in their wake. After the rally, Tea Party protesters also neatly stacked their signs around trash cans. I walked the entire section of the mall where the ra
lly took place during, after, and the next day and once everyone left it looked like no one had even been there. The very same result occurred a year later when 500,000 - 600,000 attended Glenn Beck's Restoring Honor rally.

Why the vastly different results? Simple: Leftists/liberals/progressives think the world owes them something and that everyone else should provide it. They also want to be able to engage in whatever depraved behavior they desire free from criticism. This is one reason they are so eager to wield the force of government to bend everyone else to their will, and if that is not possible then they use it to shut up their critics.

Conservative America, on the other hand, is composed of people who represent what has traditionally been good about this country. They are hard-working people who have common sense (ergo, why you don't see them sleeping in herds in the park) who understand certain immutable principles that are necessary for a happy life and a functioning, civilized society.

Eat the rich? If it weren't for conservatives the loony leftists wouldn't have the time to utter such silly statements. They'd be too busy eating each other in a vain attempt to survive.

Friday, April 8, 2011

The Coinage Act of 1792

The Coinage Act of 1792 is the enactment of the laws that support the United States Constitution. It has been amended and added to, but it is still the controlling legal law for our currency and coin. It was even the basis of a great part of the prosecution of von Nothaus. (aside: after reading the text of the jury verdict of von Nothaus's trail in Statesville, NC, I am no longer so certain that the Gov't was being tyrannical. Not sure they were right, but not certain) But that is not why I am writing this. I have discovered that § 19 of the Act authorizes the death penalty for government officials who debase the currency. Wouldn't that be a sensation! Just one trial of a Secretary of the Treasury. We would need to win, of course. But even if he were given clemency instead of actually killed, it would still put the fear of the Lord in the next Secretary.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Wikileaks observation:

How can I take this guy (Julian Assange) seriously when he looks so much like David Spade?

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Reply to Adrian Vance

A response to Adrian Vance's blog.

You are more generous to the state than I. My inflation estimate was ten times from 1964 to 2000 alone.
A Coca-cola was a nickel at work and a dime at the gas station in 1964. Fifty cents and a dollar in 2000.
A loaf of bread 18¢ to $1.80. A gallon of milk 32¢ to $3.20. In 1965 had a lucky Summer job, a union job that paid more than my minimum wage cohort. Grown men were buying homes and raising families on it ... $2.25 an hour. The equivalent paid $22.50 in 2000. That top of the line Ford Mustang I bought for $3200 in 1969? My son bought the equivalent for $32,000. There are others, but it general I find a ten-fold increase from 1964 to the year 2000.

There were, of course, exceptions: medicine, taxes, and gasoline.
1) Medicine was much cheaper in 1965 when I spent a week in the hospital, but it consisted of penicillin, aspirin, measuring temperature and blood pressure, and sleeping pills. Had I had my throat cancer then rather than in 2005, I would have had no radiotherapy, no micro surgery, no chemotherapy. In other words, I would be long dead.

2) My taxes went to 40 times the amount I paid back then but allowing for 10x inflation (in amount, not the damage done by inflation) that is only 4 times. Four times? That's still a lot.

3) And finally gasoline: Remember two Summers ago? When gas was 4 dollars plus a gallon? When everyone was told to blame those evil oil companies? I thought it was cheap. In 1964 one dollar would buy four 25¢ gallons of gasoline. In 2008 one dollar would buy four gallons of gasoline - one SILVER dollar. It wasn't the gasoline that changed. It wasn't the silver dollar that changed. It was that paper thing, the FRN, the only bill of all the different kinds ever printed¹ in this country that actually purports itself to be the dollar and not redeemable with a dollar. That was the one that changed. But we were told to damn the oil companies, not the government and dutifully we did. But for the longest time, our gasoline has been incredibly cheap compared to 1964. It is just the numbers that look bigger.

You appear old enough in your avatar to have been around in the Spring of 1964. I was awaiting graduation and had college, girls and other things on my mind and did not notice the world around me. The media was concerned with the grassy knoll and ignored all else. The most important thing in my lifetime occurred. It was one of Lyndon Baines Johnsons' very first official acts, something he had been wanting to do since 1932 when he was a Representative from Texas and a protégé of Senator Sam Rayburn, and instrumental in removing private ownership of gold - He demonetized silver. Then can blame the Nixon shock, stiffing de Gaulle's run on our under-priced gold, thus breaking Bretton Woods, but the truth is the tie to silver is more responsible for our inflation that lack of gold is. The tie to silver was the tie to limited dollar printing.

Thank you for you patience, and I have enjoyed what I have read and will go read some more.

¹ http://luxomni.blogspot.com/2008/08/as-constant-as-dollar.html

Thursday, November 11, 2010

We resemble that remark

The continued health of a democratic state requires the interplay of three factors: [1] the covert processes of realpolitik wherein the electorate is consigned the role of rubber-stamping either of two fungible candidates offered up by the owners of the system; [2] reinforcement of the fantasy that voters have some real-world influence over the selection of their political rulers; and [3] the illusion that the winning candidate is the one who is really running the government.
- Butler Shaffer

Friday, November 5, 2010

Bridgeport, Connecticut Found a Bag of Uncounted Ballots!

In an election related development, it is reported that election officials have found a bag of "uncounted ballots" under a bridge in Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Previously there was a problem with insufficient preprinted ballots, so the State of Connecticut officials had to Xerox sufficient ballots for the number of people voting. Now a bag has been found that was previously uncounted that changed the State Governor's race from Republican to Democrat. This raises several interesting questions:

1) Why is it that these "mistakes" always seem to favor the Democrat candidate?

2) Were just enough found to get the job done?

3a) Did they even bother to make some Republican fraudulent ballots to look like an honest mistake?
3b) Or did the not even have to worry about that kind of scrutiny?

4) Were the ballots Xeroxed with the candidates already selected so that it would be less work filling them in?

Just like Florida, the press will ignore the fact that the cheating occurs at the county level; and all the state does is total the results from each county. They never even see the ballots. (Or didn't back when there was visible evidence.) If only our news reporters had taken basic civics.

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Fair and Balanced.

Fair and balanced is not just an expression, some one nicknamed jayzz posted it best over on Real Clear Politics:

The difference between MSNBC's coverage, and Fox News coverage of the election results is that Fox News is not ridiculing any of the democratic winners. Fox News is showing the speeches of the winners, and treating them with respect. MSNBC is laughing at republican winners, and ridiculing them. The liberal media is disgusting.

This is what the Liberals do not get. This is why CNN is losing ratings to Fox. Civility. The Progressive movement is about [perceived] superiority. They believe themselves to be the elite ... the intellectual elite. And they have teamed up with the financial elite to put the rest of us "great unwashed", "rubes", "hicks", "country class" out here in "flyover country" in "our place".

Well, Chris Matthews, Chris Ness wouldn't even swap his mean little country home for your Park Avenue Apartment. I have seen (and lived) in a few of the blue areas¹ of your map. Not a life a sane person should want.

¹ You guys controlled the media. Any particular reason you kept blue and gave us red? Like maybe red was too closely associated with who you are pretending not to be?

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Not All Viruses Are In The Body, Some Are In The E-mails

As they told me during my cancer treatments: "The purpose of Chemotherapy is not to either kill or eliminate Cancer. Chemotherapy is to stop the spread of cancer by making the body inhospitable for the successful spread of cancer."

The best way to analogize it is that metastases are cells that have broken off of the primary cancer due to the fractal way that it grows (think cauliflower). These then circulate through the body through blood, lymph, or even open passage to ultimately become "marooned" on some distant part of your body like the liver or brain. Because these cells are genetically "you", the body will not reject them and they will plant like seeds wherever they land. This tissue retains the character of whatever the initial cancer was. Hence, breast or prostate tissue growing on the brain or wherever. This is why they use the term atypical to describe them. They often don't even look like the surrounding tissue. Chemotherapy makes the body inimicable to the attachment and growth of these new colonies and can often starve the growth of the parent cancer, but only at the margins where blood and nutrition are not sufficient to support the cells anyway - the very cells that were to metastasize, break off, and recolonize.

THE ONLY THING THAT WILL KILL CANCER IS SURGERY OR RADIATION (Which is only an electron beam scalpel.) BECAUSE, cancer is you. Any chemical that would kill it would kill you. These diets that claim to starve it away would starve you as well.

I have scattered more commentary throughout Judee's essay

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:14 -0400, af1skee Hotmail.com forwarded:
Johns Hopkins Update – Very Good Article

AFTER YEARS OF TELLING PEOPLE CHEMOTHERAPY
IS THE ONLY WAY TO TRY ('TRY', BEING THE KEY WORD) TO ELIMINATE CANCER, JOHNS HOPKINS IS FINALLY STARTING TO TELL YOU THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY .
Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins :
1. Every person has cancer cells in the body. These cancer
cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have
multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients
that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after
treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the
cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable
size.

NO, Every cell is a cancer cell. Every cell has the potential to become cancerous. There is little special about them until they actually become cancer. A broken thread of DNA here, or a genetic error there or an inclusion there. This is why prevention is only a false hope.

2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a
person's lifetime.

At the very least.

3. When the person's immune system is strong the cancer
cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and
forming tumors.
Yes .. but only to outside influences such as HPV. Cancers are errors of the normal reproductive controls of individual cells of yourself. For your immune system to destroy them, you would be definition have an auto-immune disorder. (Are you sure this was written by someone from John's Hopkins?)

4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has
nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic,
but also to environmental, food and lifestyle factors.

Big leap here. The second half is correct.


5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing
diet to eat more adequately and healthy, 4-5 times/day
and by including supplements will strengthen the immune system.

Propaganda here to support his #4 thesis

6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing
cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells
in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract etc, and can
cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

True. See my thesis at the beginning.

7.. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars
and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

Yes, but with IMRT the doses at sites other than the target are minimalized. But to an extent, these secondary sites are those same sites which might have nearby metastases.
(A side anecdotal observation of no general value: I had bad internal mouth sores from childhood. Since the radiotherapy in early 2005 I have not had ANY. Apparently those cells were killed also)

8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often
reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of
chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor
destruction.

Chemotherapy does not kill cancer. See my note at beginning of message. Radiation is actually surgery burning away tissue.

9. When the body has too much toxic burden from
chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either
compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb
to various kinds of infections and complications.

Also a burden on the kidneys and liver, BUT, so it the necrotizing tissue from a cancer that overgrows its blood and nutrition and withers.

10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to
mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy.

No. The cells are not adaptive in that way. Always remember these cells for good or bad are your own. They are difficult to eliminate because of where they are, infiltrated amongst the healthy and important cells of your body.

Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other
sites.

I have read this described as urban legend, but to me, it seems plausible that a sloppy surgeon could screw up.

11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer
cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply.

It might help ... a little, but as a complex system, you will starve to death before the simple system of your cancer.

*CANCER CELLS FEED ON:
a. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made
with Aspartame and it is harmful. A better natural substitute
would be Manuka honey or molasses, but only in very small
amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in
color Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt.


Here is the author's thesis that she is trying to push, and she is mostly wrong. Aspertame may or may not be harmful (I believe it is), but cancer cells do not feed on it.
Here is why: Asperatame is non-nutritive. That is why it works as a non-fattening sugar substitute. That could also be a reason that it could cause cancer - an inert foreign body (like asbestos) where it shouldn't be irritating and interfering. But, "Cancer cells feed on" real sugars. They eat 1000 times more sugar that a normal cell. This is why (most) cancers can be located with a PET scan of radioactive tagged glucose.
Therefore, her honey or molasses will only feed the cancer. Sorry, Judee.

b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the
gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting
off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer
cells are being starved.

Never heard that cancer feeds on mucus before. But even the premise is odd. Milk has a mucus-like protein called casein that leaves the film on the inside of the glass or your mouth. Casein was the protein in the medical food that I was prescribed for PEG tube feeding during my cancer. I could not tolerate it and it caused me to vomit. Real Mucus is entirely different and not even related. The reason that Casein leaves a film on the inside of your mouth is that it doesn't mix easily with the body's own mucus. Casein based medical food was prescribed so that my body would have a supply of protein and not cannibalize itself while I could not eat. The author here is recommending starving your body of protein to avoid feeding the cancer.
I think I detect a Vegan health-food zealot rationalizing her beliefs.

c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based
diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little other meat,

Exactly the opposite. Chemotherapy lowers the body's pH. There are good reasons to reduce our consumption of meat, but this is BS (and that is a meat by-product)

like chicken. Meat also contains livestock
antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all
harmful, especially to people with cancer.

I thought I smelled Vegan propaganda. They might initially cause a cancer, but to a cancer in progress? Rationalization of pre-held conclusions.

d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole
grains, seeds, nuts

No warning about the dangers of nuts and colon cancer?

and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment.

Overreaching BS. Do a little figuring - if it were even possible to raise the body's pH, would would be the effect on the Amino acids that are your body? A little Googling to find the natural pH of the body found 72 million different answers! These had ranges from 7.68 to 6.8 in the first few dozen I found. All were pushing some kind of agenda or other and not one credible scientific establishment!

About 20% can be from cooked
food including beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live
enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to
cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance
growth of healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building
healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most
vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw
vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at
temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C)..
e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high
caffeine Green tea is a better alternative e and has cancer
fighting properties. Water-best to drink purified water, or
filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap
water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.

Johns Hopkins, huh. Distilled water is acidic? Distilled water is pH7. By definition, water is neutral.
(50% of the population will always be of below average intelligence.)

12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of
digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the
intestines becomes putrefied and leads to more toxic
buildup.

Gotta love the Progressive food police. I think the truth is that the Progressive elite do not want us competing with them for food. Malthus, anyone?

13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By
refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes
to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the
body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.

BS, cancer cells are the same compositionally as the parent cells. It is the reproduction that has been turned on to high gear.
But let me understand her logic... The enzymes would be digesting the protein covering on cancer cells (read her own body cells) were they not occupied digesting the meat in her colon. I don't think so...

14. Some supplements build up the immune system
(IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals,
EFAs etc.) to enable the bodies own killer cells to destroy
cancer cells.. Other supplements like vitamin E are known
to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's
normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or
unneeded cells.
Some truth carried to presumed conclusions. But always back to that same premise that somehow cancer cells are not cells of the host.

15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit.
A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior
be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put
the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to
have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy
life.
Aom. You really passed this New-Age shit on to me? There I go, another cancer.

16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated
environment. Exercising daily, and deep breathing help to
get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen
therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer
cells.
Pure oxygen kills most everything.

1. No plastic containers in micro.
2. No water bottles in freezer.
3. No plastic wrap in microwave..

Sort of jumps around doesn't it. Hitting all the issues that those who would tell us how to run our lives espouse.

Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals cause cancer,
... [more redundant drivel removed for brevity]...
Please share this with your whole email list.........................

Johns Hopkins may have published something. But there are many hands at work here pushing a number of "Liberal" agendas. (I use Liberal here in quotes, because true liberal was libertarian, not about controlling others as Progressive "Liberalism" is now) This is propaganda, pure and simple.

Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.
This is an article that should be sent to anyone important in your life.
> --
> Judee
>
(Even the name is a give away to her bias. Judee is an just affectated way of spelling Judy.)

By the way, I have outlived all my health food fanatic peers but one. And I'm waiting for him ...